BRUSSELS — A coalition of digital advertisers and publishers has called on antitrust regulators in the European Union and the United Kingdom to suspend new commercial terms from Meta Platforms that take effect on October 30, arguing the terms would hand the tech giant an unlimited right to use their content to power its artificial intelligence services, Reuters reported on Thursday, October 22.
Illustration: Publishers say Meta's new terms would let the company feed their content into AI services with no way to opt out (AI-generated illustration).
What Happened
The Movement for an Open Web, an advocacy group whose members include digital advertisers and publishers, filed complaints with the European Commission and the UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), asking both regulators to impose interim measures that would halt Meta's new terms before they come into force on October 30, according to Reuters.
Tim Cowen, a co-founder of the group, told Reuters the terms are "clearly anti-competitive" and would "force them to sign away the rights to their digital content with no means of opting out." The group alleges the terms give Meta "an unlimited right to use their content for its AI services" — a claim that goes to the heart of how large language models and generative AI systems are trained on web content.
Meta disputed the complaint. A company spokesperson said the consolidated crawling terms "only applied to our ads and business products" and "does not change how Meta uses web crawlers," adding that content owners can continue to use the long-standing robots.txt standard to control how automated crawlers access their sites.
The regulators' responses are still pending. The CMA told Reuters it met with Meta on Wednesday, October 21, and is in "urgent discussions" as it considers next steps. A European Commission spokesperson confirmed it had received the complaint and would assess it in line with its usual procedure.
Under competition rules, companies seeking interim measures must show they will suffer serious and irreparable damage from the alleged anti-competitive practices — a high bar designed for emergency relief while a full investigation runs its course.
Background
The latest complaint did not arrive in isolation. Reuters reported that the Movement for an Open Web's move followed a complaint by the European Publishers Council last week and separate objections earlier in the week from Germany's publisher groups BDZV and MVFP, suggesting a coordinated escalation by the European publishing industry as the October 30 deadline approaches.
The fight reflects a broader global battle over AI training data. Publishers, news organizations and creative industries have spent the past two years clashing with AI companies over the use of copyrighted material to train models, with a string of lawsuits and licensing deals reshaping the rules. At issue in this case is not a model release but the plumbing underneath: the crawling terms that determine what automated systems may collect from the web.
Meta's position is that it is simply consolidating its crawling terms for advertising and business products, and that nothing changes for its web crawlers. The publishers' counterargument, as reported by Reuters, is that the consolidated terms effectively sweep their content into Meta's AI pipeline with no opt-out mechanism — a reading Meta rejects.
One caveat matters for readers: the full text of Meta's new commercial terms has not been publicly verified beyond what Reuters reported — the allegations, Meta's response and the regulators' positions as described in the October 22 wire report. The article reports the dispute as framed by the parties, not the underlying contractual language itself.
Illustration: The European Commission and the UK's CMA are weighing whether to grant interim measures before the October 30 deadline (AI-generated illustration).
Why It Matters
This dispute matters because training data is the fuel of the AI economy, and the terms on which that fuel is taken are still being written. If regulators agree with the publishers, it would be one of the first times competition authorities have used interim measures to freeze AI-related commercial terms before they take effect — a precedent that every other large platform with AI ambitions would have to study. If they decline, publishers would have to fight the terms through slower, full-length investigations while the October 30 terms operate in the meantime.
For publishers, the stakes are existential. Advertising revenue already flows overwhelmingly through the platforms, and many news organizations argue that AI systems trained on their reporting then compete with them directly by answering the questions readers used to visit them for. An "unlimited right" to use content for AI services, as the group characterizes the terms, would entrench that dynamic with no compensation and no exit.
The case also tests the limits of robots.txt as an answer. Meta points to the decades-old standard as the opt-out mechanism, but publishers have increasingly argued that robots.txt was designed for search indexing, not for training generative models — and that relying on it puts the burden on content owners to defend what the platforms take by default.
What Happens Next
The calendar is the story now. Meta's terms take effect on October 30, so both the European Commission and the CMA face a compressed window to decide whether interim measures are warranted. The CMA's "urgent discussions" suggest a decision could come within days; the Commission's assessment follows its standard procedure, which publishers will hope moves faster than usual given the deadline.
Watch for three things: whether either regulator grants interim relief before October 30, whether Meta amends or delays the terms to defuse the complaint, and whether publishers in other jurisdictions file parallel challenges. Whatever happens on October 30, the underlying question — who controls the content that trains AI — is heading for a much longer legal reckoning.
Illustration: At stake is who controls the content that trains generative AI models (AI-generated illustration).
Sponsored: explore today's featured sponsored offers
FAQ
What are Meta's new commercial terms?
They are consolidated crawling terms Meta plans to put into effect on October 30, 2026. Publishers allege the terms grant Meta an unlimited right to use their content for its AI services with no opt-out; Meta says the terms only apply to its ads and business products and do not change how its web crawlers work, according to Reuters.
Who is asking regulators to block them?
The Movement for an Open Web, an advocacy group whose members include digital advertisers and publishers. It has complained to the European Commission and the UK's Competition and Markets Authority and requested interim measures to suspend the terms.
What did Meta say in response?
A Meta spokesperson disputed the complaint, saying the consolidated crawling terms "only applied to our ads and business products" and "does not change how Meta uses web crawlers," and noted that content owners can use robots.txt to control crawler access.
What are interim measures?
They are emergency competition-law relief that can freeze disputed practices while a full investigation runs. Companies requesting them must show they would suffer serious and irreparable damage from the alleged anti-competitive conduct.
What happens on October 30?
The terms take effect unless a regulator grants interim measures, Meta amends or delays them, or a court intervenes. Both the Commission and the CMA had live responses pending at the time of reporting.
Sources
- Reuters (reporting by Foo Yun Chee, Brussels) — "Publishers, advertisers call EU, UK antitrust regulators to suspend Meta's new commercial terms" (Oct 22, 2026), via wire republication: https://wabx.net/2026/10/22/publishers-advertisers-call-eu-uk-antitrust-regulators-to-suspend-metas-new-commercial-terms/
Comments
Post a Comment